Hitting and missing targets by ambulance services for emergency calls: effects of different systems of performance measurement within the UK
Gwyn Bevan and
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 2009, vol. 172, issue 1, pages 161-190
Following devolution, differences developed between UK countries in systems of measuring performance against a common target that ambulance services ought to respond to 75% of calls for what may be immediately life threatening emergencies (category A calls) within 8 minutes. Only in England was this target integral to a ranking system of 'star rating', which inflicted reputational damage on services that failed to hit targets, and only in England has this target been met. In other countries, the target has been missed by such large margins that services would have been publicly reported as failing, if they had been covered by the English system of star ratings. The paper argues that this case-study adds to evidence from comparisons of different systems of hospital performance measurement that, to have an effect, these systems need to be designed to inflict reputational damage on those that have performed poorly; and it explores implications of this hypothesis. The paper also asks questions about the adequacy of systems of performance measurement of ambulance services in UK countries. Copyright Journal compilation (c) 2009 Royal Statistical Society.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00557.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:172:y:2009:i:1:p:161-190
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://ordering.onli ... 1111/(ISSN)1467-985X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A is currently edited by A. Chevalier and L. Sharples
More articles in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A from Royal Statistical Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().