EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does cross listing in the USA really enhance the value of emerging market firms?

O'Connor, Thomas G. ()

Review of Accounting and Finance, 2009, vol. 8, issue 3, pages 308-336

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the valuation effects of cross listing in the USA for a panel of emerging market firms over the period from 1990 to 2003. Design/methodology/approach – Using firm-level data from Worldscope, the paper examines the valuation effects of listing in the USA for a panel of emerging market firms. Specifically, the following techniques are employed in order to control for self-selection bias: calculate the average effect of the treatment on the treated using propensity score matching, pooled ordinary least squares with Mundlak corrections, firm-fixed effects, and panel treatment effects models. Findings – In line with previous researches, only those firms from high-disclosure regimes gain from Level 2/3 listing in the USA. The gains are not immediate, but materialize once the firm has listed in the USA for at least five years. Also documented were long-term, but not immediate valuation gains for Level 1 over-the-counterissues. In contrast to Level 2/3 issues, the gains are concentrated amongst firms from low-disclosure regimes. No positive valuation effects were found for Rule 144a private placements. The results suggest that the decision on the part of the majority of firms from low-disclosure regimes not to list as exchange traded depositary receipts is warranted. Research limitations/implications – It may have been interesting to further examine the causes of the results. For example, it would have been interesting to see how firm visibility (media and analyst coverage), liquidity, and capital issuance changed around the time of listing. However, data availability prevented such an analysis. Originality/value – As opposed to standard event studies, this paper examines the effect of listing on firm value using valuation metrics, i.e. Tobin's q. Second, and unlike event studies, the techniques employed are substantially more robust to self-selection bias.

Keywords: Disclosure; Emerging markets; Shares; Stock exchanges; United States of America; Value analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentI ... le&contentId=1805576 (text/html)
Cannot be freely downloaded

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:8:y:2009:i:3:p:308-336

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
http://emeraldgroupp ... /journals.htm?id=raf

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Accounting and Finance is currently edited by C Janie Chang and Janis Zaima

More articles in Review of Accounting and Finance from Emerald Group Publishing
Series data maintained by Louise Lister ().

 
Page updated 2014-10-25
Handle: RePEc:eme:rafpps:v:8:y:2009:i:3:p:308-336