Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors

Michael Hoerger, Stuart W. Quirk, Richard E. Lucas and Thomas H. Carr

Judgment and Decision Making, 2010, vol. 5, issue 5, pages 365-373

Abstract: Often to the detriment of human decision making, people are prone to an impact bias when making affective forecasts, overestimating the emotional consequences of future events. The cognitive processes underlying the impact bias, and methods for correcting it, have been debated and warrant further exploration. In the present investigation, we examined both individual differences and contextual variables associated with cognitive processing in affective forecasting for an election. Results showed that the perceived importance of the event and working memory capacity were both associated with an increased impact bias for some participants, whereas retrieval interference had no relationship with bias. Additionally, an experimental manipulation effectively reduced biased forecasts, particularly among participants who were most distracted thinking about peripheral life events. These findings have theoretical implications for understanding the impact bias, highlight the importance of individual differences in affective forecasting, and have ramifications for future decision making research. The possible functional role of the impact bias is discussed within the context of evolutionary psychology.

Keywords: affective forecasting; impact bias; focalism; immune neglect; working memory. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://journal.sjdm.org/10/9607/jdm9607.pdf (application/pdf)
http://journal.sjdm.org/10/9607/jdm9607.html (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:5:p:365-373

Access Statistics for this article

Judgment and Decision Making is edited by Jonathan Baron

More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().