The Effect of Concealed Weapons Laws: An Extreme Bound Analysis

William Alan Bartley and Mark A. Cohen ()

Economic Inquiry, 1998, vol. 36, issue 2, pages 258-65

Abstract: John R. Lott and David B. Mustard (1997} provide evidence that enactment of concealed handgun ('right-to-carry') laws deters violent crime and induces substitution into property crime. A critique by Dan A. Black and Daniel S. Nagin (1998) questions the particular model specification used in the empirical analysis. In this paper, the authors estimate the 'model uncertainty' surrounding the model specified by Lott and Mustard using an extreme bound analysis (Edward Leamer 1983). They find that the deterrence results are robust enough to make them difficult to dismiss as unfounded, particularly those findings about the change in violent crime trends. The substitution effects are not robust with respect to different model specifications. Copyright 1998 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:36:y:1998:i:2:p:258-65

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is edited by Preston McAfee

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International
Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().