Sensationalism, Newspaper Profits and the Marginal Value of Watergate

Fred S McChesney

Economic Inquiry, 1987, vol. 25, issue 1, pages 135-44

Abstract: Newspaper publishers supposedly profit from sensational events. Focusing on the two different products sold by publishers, newspapers and ad vertising space, this paper shows why sensational events do not necessarily increase publishers' wealth. It also uses financial market analysis to examine the wealth effects of one sensational event, Watergate, on a portfolio of newspaper stocks and on the Washington Post in particular. No significant effects are found. Copyright 1987 by Oxford University Press.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:25:y:1987:i:1:p:135-44

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Inquiry is edited by Preston McAfee

More articles in Economic Inquiry from Western Economic Association International
Address: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Oxford University Press ().