EconPapers has moved to http://EconPapers.repec.org! Please update your bookmarks.
Research Evaluation
1991 - 2013
from Oxford University Press
Access Statistics for this journal.
RSS feed
Is something missing from the series or not right? See the RePEc data check for the archive and series .
Volume 22, issue 2 , 2013
Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities pp. 79-92 Michael Ochsner , Sven E. Hug and Hans-Dieter Daniel Competency-based assessment of academic interdisciplinary research and implication to university management pp. 93-104 Hiroyuki Kodama , Kenji Watatani and Shintaro Sengoku Accountability, performance assessment, and evaluation: Policy pressures and responses from research councils pp. 105-117 Creso M. Sá , Andrew Kretz and Kristjan Sigurdson Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund's final project report data pp. 118-133 Rüdiger Mutz , Lutz Bornmann and Hans-Dieter Daniel Facilitating social and natural science cross-disciplinarity: Assessing the human and social dynamics program pp. 134-144 Jon Garner , Alan L. Porter , Maura Borrego , Elizabeth Tran and Rita Teutonico Volume 22, issue 1 , 2012
Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education pp. 1-14 Fumi Kitagawa and Claire Lightowler Agent-based simulation of cooperative innovation in R&D pp. 15-29 Almas Heshmati and Flávio Lenz-Cesar Applying the criteria indicators and metrics evaluation method on ICT research: The HUMBOLDT project pp. 30-40 Zaheer Khan , David Ludlow and Joachim Rix Selecting competent referees to assess research projects proposals: A study of referees' registers pp. 41-51 Giovanni Abramo , Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo and Fulvio Viel Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach pp. 52-63 Friedrich Dornbusch , Ulrich Schmoch , Nicole Schulze and Nadine Bethke Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey pp. 64-77 Elea Giménez-Toledo , Carlos Tejada-Artigas and Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez Volume 21, issue 5 , 2012
Introducing the issue theme: Rising to the challenges of R&D impact assessment pp. 329-331 Juan D. Rogers Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme pp. 332-343 Erik Arnold Research on derivative effects created by Japanese national R&D projects pp. 344-353 Sayaka Shishido , Masaru Yamashita , Junichi Yoshida and Mitsuru Takeshita Evaluating health research impact: Development and implementation of the Alberta Innovates -- Health Solutions impact framework pp. 354-367 Kathryn E. R. Graham , Heidi L. Chorzempa , Pamela A. Valentine and Jacques Magnan Program-level assessment of research centers: Contribution of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers to US Nanotechnology National Initiative goals pp. 368-380 Juan D. Rogers , Jan Youtie and Luciano Kay Assessing the effects of a collaborative research funding scheme: An approach combining meta-evaluation and evaluation synthesis pp. 381-391 Barbara Good Social network analysis comparing researcher collaborations in two cardiovascular cohort studies pp. 392-405 Matthew Eblen , Richard R. Fabsitz , Jean L. Olson , Katrina Pearson , Lindsay R. Pool , Mona Puggal , Charles Wu and Robin M. Wagner Volume 21, issue 4 , 2012
Evaluating the functioning and impacts of funding schemes. New methodological developments of indicators pp. 243-244 Benedetto Lepori , Emanuela Reale and Maria Nedeva The social construction of indicators for evaluation: Internationalization of Funding Agencies pp. 245-256 Emanuela Reale , Annamaria Inzelt , Benedetto Lepori and Peter van den Besselaar Characterizing researchers to study research funding agency impacts: The case of the European Research Council's Starting Grants pp. 257-269 Duncan Thomas and Maria Nedeva Funding programmes for young scientists--Do the 'best' apply? pp. 270-279 Jörg Neufeld and Stefan Hornbostel The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005--9) pp. 280-290 Truyken L. B. Ossenblok , Tim C. E. Engels and Gunnar Sivertsen Relational arenas in a regional Higher Education system: Insights from an empirical analysis pp. 291-305 M. Seeber , B. Lepori , T. Agasisti , R. Tijssen , C. Montanari and G. Catalano The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making pp. 306-318 Abdullah Gök and Jakob Edler Assessment of the impact of a clinical and health services research call in Catalonia pp. 319-328 Paula Adam , Maite Solans-Domènech , Joan M. V. Pons , Marta Aymerich , Silvina Berra , Imma Guillamon , Emilia Sánchez and Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda Volume 21, issue 3 , 2012
The practice of evaluation in innovation policy in Europe pp. 167-182 Jakob Edler , Martin Berger , Michael Dinges and Abdullah Gök An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevance pp. 183-188 Caroline S. Wagner and Loet Leydesdorff Funding decisions, peer review, and scientific excellence in physical sciences, chemistry, and geosciences pp. 189-198 Thed N. van Leeuwen and Henk F. Moed Research assessment and monetary rewards: the overemphasized impact factor in China pp. 199-203 Ju-fang Shao and Hui-yun Shen Co-authored research publications and strategic analysis of public--private collaboration pp. 204-215 Robert J. W. Tijssen Integration of environmental impacts into ex-post assessments of international agricultural research: Conceptual issues, applications, and the way forward pp. 216-228 Jeffrey William Bennett , Timothy G. Kelley and Mywish K. Maredia Quality and influence in literary work: evaluating the 'educated imagination' pp. 229-241 Alesia Zuccala Volume 21, issue 2 , 2012
The role of references in scientific papers: Cited papers as objects of research pp. 87-88 Marek Kosmulski Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF program pp. 89-104 Jon G. Garner , Alan L. Porter , Nils C. Newman and Todd A. Crowl Public gains from entrepreneurial research: Inferences about the economic value of public support of the Small Business Innovation Research program pp. 105-112 Stuart Douglas Allen , Stephen K. Layson and Albert N. Link Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: High- and low-impact citation indicators pp. 113-125 Neus Herranz and Javier Ruiz-Castillo Cyclical long-term development of complex technologies--Premature expectations in nanotechnology?-super-† pp. 126-135 Ulrich Schmoch and Axel Thielmann Learning to invest better: Using ex post investment analysis on agri-environmental research and development pp. 136-151 Stuart Pearson , Peter Chudleigh , Sarah Simpson and Nick Schofield The importance of integrating risk in retrospective evaluations of research and development-super-† pp. 152-165 Peter Linquiti Volume 21, issue 1 , 2012
Research Evaluation, Bill Page and Oxford University Press pp. 1-1 Gretchen B. Jordan Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency pp. 2-14 Tommaso Agasisti , Giuseppe Catalano , Paolo Landoni and Roberto Verganti Research centers as agents of change in the contemporary academic landscape: their role and impact in HBCU, EPSCoR, and Majority universities pp. 15-32 Juan D. Rogers Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation pp. 33-47 J. Edler , L. Georghiou , K. Blind and Elvira Uyarra Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices pp. 48-60 Terttu Luukkonen Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economics pp. 61-70 Thed N. van Leeuwen and Clara Calero Medina Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings pp. 71-78 Mu-Hsuan Huang Calibration of bibliometric indicators in space exploration research: a comparison of citation impact measurement of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences pp. 79-85 A.J. Nederhof , T.N. Van Leeuwen and P. Clancy Volume 20, issue 5 , 2011
Farewell Beech Tree, hello Oxford University Press pp. 351-351 William Page What are the key indicators for evaluating the activities of universities? pp. 353-363 Davinia Palomares-Montero and Adela García-Aracil Systematic grant and funding body acknowledgement data for publications: new dimensions and new controversies for research policy and evaluation pp. 365-375 John Rigby Perceptions and actions: relationships of views on risk with citation actions of nanotechnology scientists pp. 377-388 Jan Youtie , Stephen Carley , Philip Shapira , Elizabeth A Corley and Dietram A Scheufele Measuring the influence of nanotechnology environmental, health and safety research pp. 389-395 Stephen Carley and Alan L Porter Categorizing h-index variants pp. 397-409 M Schreiber , C C Malesios and S Psarakis Mobility, productivity, gender and career development of Argentinean life scientists pp. 411-421 Koen Jonkers Volume 20, issue 4 , 2011
Introduction to a special section on approaches to predicting and tracing R&D program effects for policy learning pp. 263-266 Juan D Rogers and Gretchen Jordan The interactive heuristic review mechanism: a new method of assessing pioneering research projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China pp. 267-274 Yue Wang , Xiaoxuan Li and Yonghe Zheng Using fishbone analysis to improve the quality of proposals for science and technology programs pp. 275-282 Shan-Shan Li and Ling-Chu Lee Promoting interdisciplinarity in the life sciences: a case study pp. 283-292 Kate Baumwol , Sharon T Mortimer , Timothy R Huerta , Cameron D Norman and Alison M J Buchan Evaluating Ohio's portfolio of technology programs pp. 293-303 David Cheney and Jennifer Ozawa Tracing from applied research programs to downstream innovations: value in multiple techniques pp. 305-312 Rosalie Ruegg and Patrick Thomas TEKES impact goals, logic model and evaluation of socio-economic effects pp. 313-323 Jari Hyvärinen Average-based versus high- and low-impact indicators for the evaluation of scientific distributions pp. 325-339 Pedro Albarrán , Ignacio Ortuño and Javier Ruiz-Castillo A disadvantage of h-type indices for comparing the citation impact of two researchers pp. 341-346 L Egghe Volume 20, issue 3 , 2011
State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue pp. 175-179 Claire Donovan The ‘Payback Framework’ explained pp. 181-183 Claire Donovan and Stephen Hanney An evaluation of the Mind-Body Interactions and Health Program: assessing the impact of an NIH program using the Payback Framework pp. 185-192 Jack E Scott , Margaret Blasinsky , Mary Dufour , Rachel J Mandai and G Stephane Philogene Evaluating health research funding in Ireland: assessing the impacts of the Health Research Board of Ireland's funding activities pp. 193-200 Edward Nason , Brendan Curran , Stephen Hanney , Barbara Janta , Gillian Hastings , Mairéad O'Driscoll and Steven Wooding Assessing policy and practice impacts of social science research: the application of the Payback Framework to assess the Future of Work programme pp. 201-209 Lisa Klautzer , Stephen Hanney , Edward Nason , Jennifer Rubin , Jonathan Grant and Steven Wooding Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment pp. 211-218 Jack Spaapen and Leonie van Drooge Tracing ‘productive interactions’ to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciences pp. 219-226 Jordi Molas-Gallart and Puay Tang Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy pp. 227-237 Sarah Bell , Ben Shaw and Annette Boaz Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts pp. 239-246 J Britt Holbrook and Robert Frodeman The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘impact agenda’: are we creating a Frankenstein monster? pp. 247-254 Ben R. Martin The impact of impact pp. 255-256 John D Brewer The impact of Payback research: developing and using evidence in policy pp. 257-258 Chris Henshall The payback of ‘Payback’: challenges in assessing research impact pp. 259-260 Martin Buxton Volume 20, issue 2 , 2011
Research: metrics, quality, and management implications pp. 90-106 Peter Andras Normalization of peer-evaluation measures of group research quality across academic disciplines pp. 107-116 Ralph Kenna and Bertrand Berche A bibliometric study of productivity and impact of modern language and literature research pp. 117-129 Anton J Nederhof Measuring research performance during a changing relationship between science and society pp. 131-143 Erik Ernø-Kjølhede and Finn Hansson Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science pp. 145-158 William Trochim Evaluation of ST&I programs: a methodological approach to the Brazilian Small Business Program and some comparisons with the SBIR program pp. 159-171 Sergio Salles-Filho , Maria Beatriz Bonacelli , Ana Maria Carneiro , Paula F Drummond de Castro and Fernando Oliveira Santos Volume 20, issue 1 , 2011
Designing indicators for policy decisions: challenges, tensions and good practices: introduction to a special issue pp. 3-5 Benedetto Lepori , Emanuela Reale and Robert Tijssen Indicator needs for the internationalisation of science policies pp. 7-17 Jakob Edler and Kieron Flanagan Evaluation of firm R&D and innovation support: new indicators and the ex-ante prediction of ex-post additionality pp. 19-29 Bianca Potì and Giovanni Cerulli Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics? pp. 31-46 Jörg Neufeld and Markus von Ins New uses of the institutional databases of universities: indicators of research activity pp. 47-60 Emanuela Reale , Daniela Alejandra De Filippo , Isabel Gómez , Benedetto Lepori , Bianca Potì , Emilia Primeri , Carole Probst and Elias Sanz Casado Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases pp. 61-72 Stefan P L de Jong , Pleun van Arensbergen , Floortje Daemen , Barend van der Meulen and Peter van den Besselaar Profiles and beyond: constructing consensus on measuring research output in communication sciences pp. 73-88 Carole Probst , Benedetto Lepori , Daniela De Filippo and Diana Ingenhoff
EconPapers is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.