Adjusting for Unequal Selection Probability in Multilevel Models: A Comparison of Software Packages
Kim Chantala (),
Suchindran Cm and
Additional contact information
Kim Chantala: Carolina Population Center, UNC at Chapel Hill
Suchindran Cm: Carolina Population Center, UNC at Chapel Hill
Dan Blanchette: Carolina Population Center, UNC at Chapel Hill
North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2005 from Stata Users Group
Most surveys collect data using complex sampling plans involving selection of both clusters and individuals with unequal probability of selection. Research in methods of using multilevel modeling (MLM) procedures to analyze such data is relatively new. Often sampling weights based on selection probabilities of individuals are used to estimate population-based models. However, sampling weights used for estimating multilevel models need to be constructed differently than weights used for single-level (population-average) models. This paper compares the capabilities of MLwiN, Mplus, LISREL, PROC MIXED (SAS), and gllamm (Stata) for estimating MLM from data collected with a complex sampling plan. We illustrate how sampling weights for estimating multilevel models with these software packages can be constructed from population average weights. Finally, we use data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health to contrast the results from these packages.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.org/nasug2005/Chantala.ppt presentation slides (application/x-mspowerpoint)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:asug05:12
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2005 from Stata Users Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F Baum ().