Group comparisons and other issues in interpreting models for categorical outcomes using Stata

J. Scott Long ()
Additional contact information
J. Scott Long: Indiana University

North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2006 from Stata Users Group

Abstract: This presentation examines methods for interpreting regression models for categorical outcomes using predicted values. The talk begins with a simple example using basic commands in Stata. It builds on this example to show how more advanced programming features in Stata along with commands in Long and Freese's SPost package can be used in more complex applications that involve plotting predictions. These tools are then applied to the problem of comparing groups in models for categorical outcomes, focusing on the binary regression model. Identification issues make commonly used tests inappropriate since these tests confound the magnitude of the regression coefficients and the variance of the error. An alternative approach is proposed based on the comparisons of the predictions across groups. This approach is illustrated by extending the tools presented in the first part of the talk.

Date: 2006-07-23
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.org/nasug2006/sug_long_25jul2006.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found
http://repec.org/nasug2006/scottlong_sug.zip (application/zip)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:asug06:15

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2006 from Stata Users Group Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().