The Rise and Fall of the Bush Doctrine: the Impact on Transatlantic Relations
Justin Vaisse Vaïsse
Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series from Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley
Abstract:
Between 2002 and 2005, a relatively coherent and profoundly renewed strategic approach to international relations was developed by the Bush administration. Premised on an optimistic assessment of great power relations ("a balance of power that favors freedom"), it emphasized the importance of promoting democracy as a way to solve many of the long-term political and security problems of the greater Middle East. It rested on the view that American military power and assertive diplomacy should be used to defeat tyrannies, challenge a pernicious status quo and coerce states into abandoning weapons of mass destruction and support for terrorism - without worrying too much about legitimacy or formal multilateralism. The Bush doctrine led to tensions with the Europeans, who for the most part shared neither the world view that underpinned it nor its optimism about possible results, especially as far as geopolitical stability, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction were concerned. Then, in 2005, two silent developments took place: the Bush administration, while insisting on staying the course rhetorically (through "transformational diplomacy"), reverted to classical realism in its actual diplomacy - largely for reasons of expediency. China and India, on the other hand, imposed themselves on the global agenda, bringing multipolarity back into the picture of the world to come. While generally closer to European views, the new American realist line remains distinct from the European insistence on strengthening the rules and institutions of global governance.
Keywords: Center for German and European Studies; CGES; comparative; conferences; European studies; IES; Institute of European studies; international; political; relations; working paper (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-04-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5qg2v2d8.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:bineur:qt5qg2v2d8
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series from Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().