‘Build a wall’. ‘Tax a shed’. ‘Fix a debt limit’. The constructive and destructive potential of populist anti-statism and ‘naïve’ statism
Patrick Dunleavy
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library
Abstract:
Populist surges, movements and parties often centre around radically simplifying policy proposals, sometimes anti-statist in intent (e.g. fix a limit to state borrowing in cash terms), and at other times pushing naïve statist solutions (e.g. build a giant wall to keep out migrants; or tax companies activities in a given shed, not their profits). Most liberal political science condemns the crudity and often unrestrained vigour of populist ‘solutions’. But on occasion they can have value in counteracting the increasing complexities that elites often build into public policies. Two case studies show populist pressure for simplification working effectively in one instance - the ‘tax shaming’ campaign against multi-nationals avoiding corporation taxes; and engendering only disorder in another instance – the effort to enforce national debt limits in nominal terms in the USA.
JEL-codes: F3 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-05-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in Policy Studies, 31, May, 2018, 39(3), pp. 310-330. ISSN: 0144-2872
Downloads: (external link)
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/88132/ Open access version. (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:88132
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LSE Research Online Documents on Economics from London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library LSE Library Portugal Street London, WC2A 2HD, U.K.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by LSERO Manager ().