Nearsighted justice

Dan Bernhardt () and Ed Nosal

No 304, Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Abstract: Chapter 11 structures complex negotiations between creditors and debtors that are overseen by a bankruptcy court. This paper identifies conditions under which it is optimal for the court to sometimes err in determining whether a firm should be liquidated. Such errors can affect the optimal action choices by both good and bad entrepreneurs. We first characterize the optimal error rate without renegotiation, providing conditions under which it is optimal for the court both to sometimes mistakenly liquidate "good firms," but not "bad firms." When creditors and debtors can renegotiate to circumvent an error-riven court and creditors have all of the bargaining power, we show that for a broad class of action choices, a blind court--one that ignores all information and hence is equally likely to liquidate a good firm as a bad one--is optimal.

Keywords: Bankruptcy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: Written
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/Workpaper/2003/WP03-04.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Near-sighted Justice (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedcwp:0304

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Diane Rosenberger ().