Are perceptions and preferences channels of transmission for social inequalities in breast cancer screening attendance?

Léontine Goldzahl ()
Additional contact information
Léontine Goldzahl: CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Three broad types of explanations can be found relative to breast cancer screening attendance: socioeconomic characteristics (education), preferences (e.g. attitude toward risk) and perceptions. These determinants are elicited in the experimental laboratory on 178 women aged between 50 and 75 years old. By performing a mediation analysis, this study aims at identifying the main drivers of screening regularity, as it is a crucial determinant of breast cancer mortality reduction. Results show that socioeconomic determinants (both from parents and the individual) have a strong impact. Women whose mother passed compulsory education are more likely to hold a degree and to be risk tolerant and hence to screen regularly. Even if more educated and richer women tend to screen more regularly, these effects are lowered once perceptions are controlled for. Indeed, almost all respondents overestimate their risk of developing breast cancer, but the less educated respondents do so even more. This study reveals that risk preference is a channel for opportunity inequalities. On the contrary, controlling for risk and benefit perceptions tend to alleviate the role played by current socioeconomic status.

Keywords: behavioral economics; cancer screening; social inequalities; perceptions; risk preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-02
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01162408v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in 2015

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01162408v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01162408

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().