Challenges in making standardisation work in healthcare: lessons from a qualitative interview study of a line-labelling policy in a UK region

Natasha Kriznik, Guillaume Lamé () and Mary Dixon-Woods
Additional contact information
Natasha Kriznik: CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], THIS.institute - THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute) - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Guillaume Lamé: CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], THIS.institute - THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute) - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Mary Dixon-Woods: THIS.institute - THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute) - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Objective: To identify and learn from efforts to design and implement a standardised policy for labelling of invasive tubing and lines across a regional health system. Design: Single case study involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis. Setting: A devolved health system in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Participants: NHS staff (n=10) and policy-makers (n=8) who were involved in the design and/or implementation of the standardised policy. Results: Though standardising labelling of invasive tubing and lines was initially seen as a common-sense technical change, challenges during the process of developing and implementing the policy were multiple and sociotechnical in nature. Major challenges related to defining the problem and the solution, limited sustained engagement with stakeholders and users, prototyping/piloting of the solution, and planning for implementation. Some frontline staff remained unconvinced of the need for or value of the policy, since they either did not believe that there was a problem or did not agree that standardised labelling was the right solution. Mundane practical issues such authorisation and resourcing, supply chains for labels, the need to restructure work practices to accommodate the new standard, and the physical features of the labels in specific clinical settings all had important impacts. Conclusions: Newly standardised tools and practices have to fit within a system of pre-existing norms, practices and procedures. We identified a number of practical, social and cultural challenges when designing and implementing a standardised policy in a regional healthcare system. Taking account of both sociocultural and technical aspects of standardisation, combined with systems thinking, could lead to more effective implementation and increase acceptability and usability of new standards.

Date: 2019
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02383789
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in BMJ Open, 2019, 9 (11), ⟨10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031771⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02383789/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02383789

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031771

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().