Patterns Of Readiness For Adaptive Action

Vadim Petrovsky
Additional contact information
Vadim Petrovsky: National Research University Higher School of Economics

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: The paper presents a fractal model of goal setting that is formally defined by a sequence of symbols in the goal-oriented prospects of a solution connected by the relationship of feasibility. The fractal model includes such elements as the “reserve of forces”, confidence in oneself as a subject of future decisions, the preliminary assessment of the availability of a solution, a sense of reality (sanity), hope for a solution, and support of the environment. They are interpreted as resources of a solution. The relationship of feasibility is defined as an equivalent of “material implication”. The listed elements that are connected by the relationship of feasibility, form goal-oriented tendencies (aspirations): the desire to solve the problem (“I want”), the assessment of the goal through mental action (“a mental trial of strength"), volitional efforts (“I must), and aspirations (“I claim”). The concept of adaptability is specified on the basis of three equalities: ‘I want = I demand from myself’ (I need), ‘I demand from myself = the situation requires from me’, ‘I claim = I attain’. Three types of adaptive goal-setting environments are described: ordered (as in experiments on the levels of aspirations), ordinary (regular) and provocative. In an ordered environment, the subject has information about the difficulty of tasks; in an ordinary environment, claims and the necessary resources are arbitrarily correlated in a previously unpredictable way; in a provocative environment, there is an equality of the subject’s aspirations and “challenges” from the environment. Numerical solutions of equations describing the elements and fragments of goal-oriented perspectives of adaptive actions in the three environments are identified as patterns of adaptability. Based on the implementation of the method of personal possibleness (that includes the distinction between the three goal setting environments represented in original questionnaires on ‘a problem of the day’ and ‘a problem to one’s taste’), the hypothesis of the adaptability of the “majority” has been confirmed: in the sample, subjects, on average, apply adaptive strategies for goal setting.

Keywords: fractal model; adaptability; implication; accumulated capabilities; environment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 31 pages
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Science, Psychology / PSY, February 2021, pages 1-31

Downloads: (external link)
https://wp.hse.ru/data/2021/02/16/1407926022/123PSY2021.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:122psy2021

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().