Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity

Marc Fleurbaey () and Vito Peragine ()
Additional contact information
Marc Fleurbaey: CNRS-CERSES, University of Paris-Descartes, CORE (University of Louvain-la-Neuve) and IDEP
Vito Peragine: University of Bari and CHILD (University of Turin)

No 141, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality

Abstract: We study the difference between the ex post and the ex ante perspectives in equality of opportunity (EOp), and the possibility of a clash between them. We argue that ex ante EOp is a potential trap because someone motivated by ex post EOp may be led to believe that ex ante EOp is another natural embodiment of the same idea. As we show, it is not. Moreover, we explore the relationship between the ex post/ex ante tension and the well documented clash between the "compensation principle" and various "reward principles": we show that the tension between reward and compensation only exists if one endorses an ex post view of EOp; on the contrary, it vanishes if one adopts an ex ante view of equality of opportunity.

Keywords: equality of opportunity; ex ante/ex post; compensation; reward (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 D71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2009-141.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2009-141

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ().