Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox
Alois Stutzer () and
Bruno Frey ()
No 1278, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
People spend a lot of time commuting and often find it a burden. According to economics, the burden of commuting is chosen when compensated either on the labor or on the housing market so that individuals’ utility is equalized. However, in a direct test of this strong notion of equilibrium, we find that people with longer commuting time report systematically lower subjective well-being. Additional empirical analyses do not find institutional explanations of the empirical results that commuters systematically incur losses. We discuss several possibilities of an extended model of human behavior able to explain this ‘commuting paradox’.
Keywords: compensating variation; commuting; location theory; subjective well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D61 R41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-geo, nep-ltv, nep-mic and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2007, 110 (2), 339 - 366
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Stress that Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox (2008)
Working Paper: Stress That Doesn't Pay: The Commuting Paradox
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: /RePEc:iza:izadps:dp1278
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Address: IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Mark Fallak ().