Financing social protection in Namibia

Klaus Schade, Justina La and Alexander Pick

No 19, OECD Development Policy Papers from OECD Publishing

Abstract: Namibia is an upper middle-income country with one of the most comprehensive social protection systems in Africa. It provides cash transfers and complementary social assistance to a range of vulnerable groups including children, the elderly and people with disabilities, at a cost equivalent to 4.5% of GDP in 2016/17. Public-sector workers are well covered by social insurance, although there are gaps in provision for the private sector. Social protection, in particular cash transfers, has proven highly effective at reducing poverty and inequality and mitigating the impact of high unemployment, although these remain persistent challenges. For Namibia to achieve its development objectives, social protection will need to play an even greater role in the future, but scaling up social protection in the current context of low economic growth and fiscal consolidation will be challenging. This paper charts the evolution of social protection provision and expenditure, locates social protection within the context of Namibia’s broader fiscal framework and proposes options for enhancing its impact without increasing public spending.

Keywords: financing; health; inclusive growth; Namibia; pensions; social protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H53 H55 H61 I38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-04-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1787/6957c65a-en (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:dcdaab:19-en

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OECD Development Policy Papers from OECD Publishing Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).