The Choice Between Multiplicative and Additive Output Uncertainty

Moawia Alghalith and Aredishir J. Dalal

No 209, CRIEFF Discussion Papers from Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm

Abstract: When modeling output uncertainty, the multiplicative specification is consistently chosen over the additive form, despite the latter being arguably intuitively more obvious. The rationale for this seems to be that when production risk is the only source of uncertainty, additive uncertainty does not reduce output below the certainty level, while multiplicative uncertainty does. We show that, regardless of the specification of output uncertainty, if hedging is absent and there is simultaneous price and output uncertainty, output is always lower than the situation in which one or both sources of uncertainty are absent. Thus, both models yield qualitatively identical results, i.e., adding a source of uncertainty reduces expected output. Therefore, additive uncertainty is indeed a reasonable a priori method of modeling production uncertainty

Keywords: Multiplicative output uncertainty; additive output uncertainty; price uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D21 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002-02
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/crieff/papers/dp0209.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:san:crieff:0209

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CRIEFF Discussion Papers from Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm
Address: School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL
Series data maintained by Tatiana Damjanovic ().