Adverse selection in the U.S. health insurance markets: Evidence from the MEPS

Cinzia Di Novi

POLIS Working Papers from Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS

Abstract: We use the 2003/2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey in conjunctions with the 2002 National Health Interview Survey to test for adverse selection in the U.S. private health insurance market. The key idea is to test whether the individuals who are more exposed to health risks also buy insurance contracts with more coverage or higher expected payments. The critical statistical problem is that the extension of insurance is only measured for those who are insured and face positive health care expenditure. So there is a possible sample selection bias effect. The procedure used is based on a method suggested by Wooldridge (1995). The method also accounts for heterogeneity across individuals. The simultaneous account taken of both possible sources of bias is new for this kind of application.

Keywords: adverse selection; health insurance; risk profile (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 I11 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 39 pages
Date: 2008-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta, nep-hea and nep-ias
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1llQgHn0sodgcgvav6 ... oZL/view?usp=sharing (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uca:ucapdv:103

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in POLIS Working Papers from Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucia Padovani ().