On the Recent Debate on Capital Theory and General Equilibrium

Fabio Petri ()

Department of Economics University of Siena from Department of Economics, University of Siena

Abstract: The paper disputes the negative conclusion of prof. Mandler on the thesis by Garegnani, Schefold, Parrinello that intertemporal general equilibrium theory too is undermined by reswitching and reverse capital deepening. The paper argues that Mandler’s conclusion rests upon highly criticisable assumptions that render the equations of intertemporal general equilibrium identical to those of general equilibria without capital goods. The Walrasian treatment of the capital endowment is criticized in Part I on the basis of its insufficient persistence, and of other ‘methodological’ criticisms that are systematically surveyed. In Part II it is shown through a numerical example that Mandler’s claim, that the assumption of a single consumer guarantees uniqueness of intertemporal equilibrium independently of reswitching or reverse capital deepening, rests on the absence of production of capital goods in the last period of the equilibrium; this assumption is thus revealed to be one of the tricks that prevents the existence of capital goods from changing the properties of the equilibrium relative to those of equilibria without capital

JEL-codes: B51 C62 D5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke
Date: 2009-09
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ-pol.unisi.it/quaderni/568.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:usi:wpaper:568

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Department of Economics University of Siena from Department of Economics, University of Siena
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Fabrizio Becatti ().