Is Review By Peers As Fair As It Appears?

J. Scott Armstrong ()

General Economics and Teaching from EconWPA

Abstract: Recent research shows that journal reviewing practices are neither objective nor fair. I propose a procedure to increase the likelihood of publishing important papers. This will be tested by Interfaces for a year.

Keywords: publication; review; peers; fairness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005-02-11
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 10
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/get/papers/0502/0502058.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0502058

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in General Economics and Teaching from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().