Details about José Luis García-Lapresta

Access statistics for papers by José Luis García-Lapresta.

Last updated 2024-09-07. Update your information in the RePEc Author Service.

Short-id: pga512

Working Papers

2012

1. Classical inequality indices, welfare functions, and the dual decomposition
   Working Papers, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality View citations (2)
   Also in DISA Working Papers, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy (2012) View citations (2)
2. Measuring consensus in a preference-approval context
   Working Papers, HAL View citations (1)

2011

3. The Gini index,the dual decomposition of aggregation functions, and the consistent measurement of inequality
   Working Papers, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality View citations (5)

2010

4. A class of poverty measures induced by the dual decomposition of aggregation functions
   Working Papers, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality View citations (1)

Journal Articles

2024

1. Clustering alternatives in preference-approvals via novel pseudometrics
   Statistical Methods & Applications, 2024, 33, (1), 61-87
2. Two characterizations of the dense rank
   Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2024, 111, (C)

2023

3. A family of distances for preference–approvals
   Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 323, (1), 1-29

2022

4. An extension of Majority Judgment to non-uniform qualitative scales
   European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 301, (2), 667-674

2020

5. Using Different Qualitative Scales in a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Procedure
   Mathematics, 2020, 8, (3), 1-20

2019

6. An ordinal multi-criteria decision-making procedure under imprecise linguistic assessments
   European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 279, (1), 159-167 View citations (4)
7. Chronicle of a Failure Foretold: 2017 Rector Election at Ghent University
   Economies, 2019, 7, (1), 1-11
8. Tratamiento ordinal de las escalas cualitativas utilizadas por el Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas || Ordinal treatment of qualitative scales used by the Center for Sociological Research
   Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, 2019, 28, (1), 124-142

2017

9. A consensus reaching process in the context of non-uniform ordered qualitative scales
   Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2017, 16, (4), 449-461

2010

10. Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2010, 34, (3), 487-496 View citations (8)
11. Performance appraisal based on distance function methods
    European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207, (3), 1599-1607 View citations (2)
12. Preference Intensities and Majority Decisions Based on Difference of Support Between Alternatives
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2010, 19, (6), 527-542 View citations (11)

2008

13. A Model of Elitist Qualification
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2008, 17, (6), 497-513 View citations (1)

2003

14. An empirical analysis of transitivity with four scaled preferential judgment modalities
    Review of Economic Design, 2003, 8, (3), 335-346
15. CHOOSING A RANKING OF ALTERNATIVES IN A TWO-STAGE GROUP DECISION PROCEDURE WITH INDIVIDUAL LINGUISTIC ASSESSMENTS
    Fuzzy Economic Review, 2003, VIII, (1), 65-79

2002

16. Borda Count versus Approval Voting: A Fuzzy Approach
    Public Choice, 2002, 112, (1-2), 167-84 View citations (3)
17. Maximal elements for irreflexive binary relations on compact sets
    Mathematical Social Sciences, 2002, 43, (1), 55-60 View citations (3)

2001

18. Majority decisions based on difference of votes
    Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2001, 35, (3), 463-481 View citations (27)

2000

19. Aggregation of fuzzy preferences: Some rules of the mean
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2000, 17, (4), 673-690 View citations (13)

Chapters

2001

1. A GROUP DECISION MAKING METHOD USING FUZZY TRIANGULAR NUMBERS
   Chapter 3 in Fuzzy Sets In Management, Economics And Marketing, 2001, pp 35-50