Froth and Bubble: The Inconsistency of Paul Krugman's Macroeconomic Analysis

Don Harding and Jan Libich

Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 2010, vol. 17, issue 1, 83-88

Abstract: Consistency is one of the touchstones used to evaluate not only arguments but also the people that put forward the arguments. In assessing the person advocating an argument, it is natural to look for coherence over time in their arguments and, secondly, whether the person offers a convincing explanation for a change of view. We apply this framework to evaluate some of Paul Krugman's macroeconomic analysis.

Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p89091/pdf/froth.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:acb:agenda:v:17:y:2010:i:1:p:83-88

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform from Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().