How to raise chance to be highly appreciated by dissertational work: whom and why invite in the Higher Attestation Commission

S. D. Reznik ()

University Management: Practice and Analysis, issue 6

Abstract: In article the factors predetermining possibility of an objective estimation of dissertational work and the competitor of a scientific degree at different levels are considered: on the basis of studying by the reviewer of the author's abstract of the dissertation, on the basis of an estimation of the author's abstract and in the course of work protection on dissertational council, on the basis of studying of attestative business of the competitor in advisory council of the Higher attestation commission

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/637/638 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adf:journl:y::id:637

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in University Management: Practice and Analysis from Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ ().