EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Incentive Hierarchies

Emmanuelle Auriol and Régis Renault

Annals of Economics and Statistics, 2001, issue 63-64, 261-282

Abstract: Because much of work incentives are provided through promotions, their effectiveness depends to a large extent on the structure of the organization's hierarchy. Here, we investigate the impact of the incentive motive on the optimal hierarchy using the Auriol-Renault [2000] framework which highlights the role of recognition in the work place. This framework provides a rationale for using promotions as an incentive device which relies on a complementarity between recognition and income: those who earn more should also earn more recognition. We identify factors which affect the hierarchy in terms of number of ranks, population size at each rank and the extent of the differentiation between ranks. We show that the harder it is for an employee to improve performance through effort the more pyramid-like is the hierarchy, with a small group of successful individuals at the top earning high income and recognition. If a high performance may be easily achieved, a seniority based promotion system may be optimal.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/20076305 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Incentive Hierarchies (2001) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2001:i:63-64:p:261-282

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Laurent Linnemer

More articles in Annals of Economics and Statistics from GENES Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Secretariat General () and Laurent Linnemer ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2001:i:63-64:p:261-282