How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments
Michael I. Norton,
Emmanuel Saez () and
American Economic Review, 2015, vol. 105, issue 4, 1478-1508
We analyze randomized online survey experiments providing interactive, customized information on US income inequality, the link between top income tax rates and economic growth, and the estate tax. The treatment has large effects on views about inequality but only slightly moves tax and transfer policy preferences. An exception is the estate tax—informing respondents of the small share of decedents who pay it doubles support for it. The small effects for all other policies can be partially explained by respondents' low trust in government and a disconnect between concerns about social issues and the public policies meant to address them. (JEL D31, D72, H23, H24)
JEL-codes: D31 D72 H23 H24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.20130360
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (149) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: How Elastic are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments (2013)
Working Paper: How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:105:y:2015:i:4:p:1478-1508
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().