Does a Bank's History Affect Its Risk-Taking?

Christa H. S. Bouwman and Ulrike Malmendier

American Economic Review, 2015, vol. 105, issue 5, 321-25

Abstract: We ask whether past macro-economic and bank-specific shocks experienced and survived by a bank affect its current capitalization and risk-taking. Using Call Report data from 1984 to 2010, we find that a bank's experience shapes its capital structure and risk appetite. Banks that have survived periods of undercapitalization tend to implement higher equity ratios and take less risk in the periods following such crises, as measured by net charge-offs, non-performing loans, or earnings volatility 10-25 years later. However, observing high rates of failure among other banks stirs banks in the opposite direction. The evidence is suggestive of institutional memory affecting banks' capital and risk-taking.

JEL-codes: G21 G28 G32 L25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151093
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.p20151093 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/ds/10505/P2015_1093_ds.zip (application/zip)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/app/10505/P2015_1093_app.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:105:y:2015:i:5:p:321-25

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().