Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition

Andrew Caplin and Mark Dean

American Economic Review, 2015, vol. 105, issue 7, 2183-2203

Abstract: Apparently mistaken decisions are ubiquitous. To what extent does this reflect irrationality, as opposed to a rational trade-off between the costs of information acquisition and the expected benefits of learning? We develop a revealed preference test that characterizes all patterns of choice "mistakes" consistent with a general model of optimal costly information acquisition and identify the extent to which information costs can be recovered from choice data. (JEL D11, D81, D83)

JEL-codes: D11 D81 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.20140117
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (255)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.20140117 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/ds/10507/20140117_ds.zip (application/zip)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/app/10507/20140117_app.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:105:y:2015:i:7:p:2183-2203

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().