The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(k) Plans
B. Douglas Bernheim (),
Andrey Fradkin and
American Economic Review, 2015, vol. 105, issue 9, 2798-2837
Default contribution rates for 401(k) pension plans powerfully influence choices. Potential causes include opt-out costs, procrastination, inattention, and psychological anchoring. Using realistically parameterized models, we show how the optimal default, the magnitude of the welfare effects, and the degree of normative ambiguity depend on the behavioral model, the scope of the choice domain deemed welfare-relevant, the use of penalties for passive choice, and other 401(k) plan features. While results are theory-specific, our analysis provides reasonably robust justifications for setting the default either at the highest contribution rate matched by the employer or—contrary to common wisdom—at zero. (JEL D14, D91, J26, J32)
JEL-codes: D14 D91 J26 J32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.20130907
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(k) Plans (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:105:y:2015:i:9:p:2798-2837
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().