EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

International Data on Measuring Management Practices

Nicholas Bloom, Renata Lemos (), Raffaella Sadun, Daniela Scur and John van Reenen

American Economic Review, 2016, vol. 106, issue 5, 152-56

Abstract: We examine methods used to survey firms on their management and organizational practices. We contrast the strengths and weaknesses of "open ended questions" (like the World Management Survey) with "closed questions" (like the MOPS). For this type of data, open ended questions give higher quality responses, but are more costly than closed question-based surveys.

JEL-codes: C55 C80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20161058
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.p20161058 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/ds/10605/P2016__ds.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: International Data on Measuring Management Practices (2016) Downloads
Working Paper: International data on measuring management practices (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:106:y:2016:i:5:p:152-56

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-24
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:106:y:2016:i:5:p:152-56