STEM Training and Early Career Outcomes of Female and Male Graduate Students: Evidence from UMETRICS Data Linked to the 2010 Census
Catherine Buffington,
Benjamin Cerf (),
Christina Jones and
Bruce Weinberg
American Economic Review, 2016, vol. 106, issue 5, 333-38
Abstract:
Women are underrepresented in science and engineering, with the underrepresentation increasing in career stage. We analyze gender differences at critical junctures in the STEM pathway--graduate training and the early career--using UMETRICS administrative data matched to the 2010 Census and W-2s. We find strong gender separation in teams, although the effects of this are ambiguous. While no clear disadvantages exist in training environments, women earn 10% less than men once we include a wide range of controls, most notably field of study. This gap disappears once we control for women's marital status and presence of children.
JEL-codes: I23 I26 J16 J24 J31 J44 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20161124
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.p20161124 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/app/10605/P2016_1124_app.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/aer/ds/10605/P2016_1124_ds.zip (application/zip)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:106:y:2016:i:5:p:333-38
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().