Economics at your fingertips  

Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia

Heather Sarsons

American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, issue 5, 141-45

Abstract: How is credit for group work allocated when individual contributions are not observed? I use data on academics' publication records to test whether demographic traits like gender influence how credit is allocated under such uncertainty. While solo-authored papers send a clear signal about ability, coauthored papers are noisy, providing no specific information about each contributor's skills. I find that men are tenured at roughly the same rate regardless of coauthoring choices. Women, however, are less likely to receive tenure the more they coauthor. The result is much less pronounced among women who coauthor with other women.

JEL-codes: A22 I23 J16 J44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171126
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) ... gEBk0RLxVKW7frF5dv9M (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

Page updated 2018-08-12
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:5:p:141-45