Economic Research Evolves: Fields and Styles
Joshua Angrist (),
Glenn Ellison (),
Ryan Hill and
Susan Feng Lu
American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, issue 5, 293-97
We examine the evolution of economics research using a machine-learning-based classification of publications into fields and styles. The changing field distribution of publications would not seem to favor empirical papers. But economics' empirical shift is a within-field phenomenon; even fields that traditionally emphasize theory have gotten more empirical. Empirical work has also come to be more cited than theoretical work. The citation shift is sharpened when citations are weighted by journal importance. Regression analyses of citations per paper show empirical publications reaching citation parity with theoretical publications around 2000. Within fields and journals, however, empirical work is now cited more.
JEL-codes: A11 A14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171117
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... plkDikGezD826WmIv1he (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... 0PIZttUDgbqikKJqQG_z (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:5:p:293-97
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jane Voros ().