Replication in Labor Economics: Evidence from Data, and What It Suggests
Daniel Hamermesh ()
American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, issue 5, 37-40
Examining the most heavily cited publications in labor economics from the early 1990s, I show that few of over 3,000 articles, citing them directly, replicates them. They are replicated more frequently using data from other time periods and economies, so that the validity of their central ideas has typically been verified. This pattern of scholarship suggests, beyond the currently required depositing of data and code upon publication, that there is little need for formal mechanisms for replication. The market for scholarship already produces replications of non-laboratory applied research.
JEL-codes: A14 J00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171121
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... TzIegTQxH7sGL-MNGTzG (application/zip)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... u_x9ShnpjZjmFa5rKIkI (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: Replication in Labor Economics: Evidence from Data, and What It Suggests (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:5:p:37-40
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().