Economics at your fingertips  

Government-Academic Partnerships in Randomized Evaluations: The Case of Inappropriate Prescribing

Adam Sacarny (), David Yokum and Shantanu Agrawal

American Economic Review, 2017, vol. 107, issue 5, 466-70

Abstract: There is growing evidence that inappropriate prescribing is harming patients and raising costs in the US health care system. Through a partnership between the federal government and academics, we seek to develop evidence on reducing this prescribing. We conduct several randomized letter interventions targeting high-volume prescribers of drugs that can harm patients. We take a continuous improvement approach, rapidly evaluating each round and using the results to inform subsequent work. The first round of letters yielded no effects, and we responded with new interventions that are now under evaluation. We discuss lessons our work provides for future government-academic partnerships.

JEL-codes: H51 I11 I18 I23 L65 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171061
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) ... 5kpnWh0eBQpJR08X49SJ (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

Page updated 2020-07-03
Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:107:y:2017:i:5:p:466-70