When Choices Are Mistakes

Kirby Nielsen and John Rehbeck

American Economic Review, 2022, vol. 112, issue 7, 2237-68

Abstract: Using a laboratory experiment, we identify whether decision-makers consider it a mistake to violate canonical choice axioms. To do this, we incentivize subjects to report axioms they want their decisions to satisfy. Then, subjects make lottery choices which might conflict with their axiom preferences. In instances of conflict, we give subjects the opportunity to re-evaluate their decisions. We find that many individuals want to follow canonical axioms and revise their choices to be consistent with the axioms. In a shorter online experiment, we show correlations of mistakes with response times and measures of cognition.

JEL-codes: C91 D12 D44 D91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201550 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.3886/E164661V1 (text/html)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201550.appx (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201550.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:112:y:2022:i:7:p:2237-68

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

DOI: 10.1257/aer.20201550

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().