Judging Judge Fixed Effects
Brigham Frandsen,
Lars Lefgren and
Emily Leslie
American Economic Review, 2023, vol. 113, issue 1, 253-77
Abstract:
We propose a nonparametric test for the exclusion and monotonicity assumptions invoked in instrumental variable (IV) designs based on the random assignment of cases to judges. We show its asymptotic validity and demonstrate its finite-sample performance in simulations. We apply our test in an empirical setting from the literature examining the effects of pretrial detention on defendant outcomes in New York. When the assumptions are not satisfied, we propose weaker versions of the usual exclusion and monotonicity restrictions under which the IV estimator still converges to a proper weighted average of treatment effects.
JEL-codes: H76 K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201860 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.3886/E179181V1 (text/html)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201860.appx (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20201860.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Judging Judge Fixed Effects (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:113:y:2023:i:1:p:253-77
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20201860
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().