Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures
David Brookshire and
Don L Coursey
American Economic Review, 1987, vol. 77, issue 4, 554-66
The problems associated with accurately measuring the value of a public good in an applied setting are considered. The values obtained from hypothetical elicitation procedures are compared and contrasted with those obtained in a marketplace. When hypothetical measurements are elicited in the field, buying-selling discrepancies similar to those predicted by psychological models of behavior are observed. However, when the market-like elicitation process is repeated, values are more consistent with diminishing marginal utility. The authors cannot reject the hypothesis that these individuals exhibit loss- aversion behavior. The marketplace, however, is a strong disciplinarian of limiting this type of behavior. Copyright 1987 by American Economic Association.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (94) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819870 ... O%3B2-F&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:77:y:1987:i:4:p:554-66
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().