Cash versus Kind, Self-selection, and Efficient Transfers

Charles Blackorby and David Donaldson

American Economic Review, 1988, vol. 78, issue 4, 691-700

Abstract: This paper investigates second-best (transfers in kind) and third-best (subsidies and taxes) Pare to optima in a simple model were government lacks full information ab out consumer types (who is able, who is infirm). These Pareto optima rely on self-selection. The authors show that those second-best Paret o optima which are not also first-best (some do exist) can only be su pported by rationing. They also show that every third-best optimum, o ther than the equal-income Walrasian equilibrium, is Pareto-dominated by some second-best optimum. In addition, standard "willingness-to- pay" cost-benefit tests are inappropriate in this environment. Copyright 1988 by American Economic Association.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (140)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819880 ... O%3B2-0&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:78:y:1988:i:4:p:691-700

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().