The Sensitivity of Tests of the Intertemporal Allocation of Consumption to Near-Rational Alternatives

John Cochrane

American Economic Review, 1989, vol. 79, issue 3, 319-37

Abstract: Suppose a consumer sets consumption equal to income each period, rather than following the optimal permanent income decision rule. How much utility does he lose? This paper finds that the answer is typically less than 10 cents-$1 per quarter in environments specified by popular tests on aggregate data. It includes calculations of the costs of excess sensitivity and excess smoothness to income and interest rate changes and the costs of ignoring information. It concludes that the theory does not make predictions for aggregate tests that are robust to small costs, such as information or transactions. Copyright 1989 by American Economic Association.

Date: 1989
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (137)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819890 ... O%3B2-P&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Sensitivity of Tests of the Intertemporal Allocation of Consumption to Near-Rational Alternatives (1988)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:79:y:1989:i:3:p:319-37

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().