Excess Volatility and Closed-End Funds

Jeffrey Pontiff

American Economic Review, 1997, vol. 87, issue 1, 155-69

Abstract: If investors are rational, the variance of closed-end mutual fund returns should equal the variance of the underlying securities in their portfolios. In fact, this paper shows that the average closed-end fund's monthly return is 64 percent more volatile than its assets. Unlike variance-bounds tests, this facilitates an excess volatility test that does not rely on strong assumptions about discount rates or dividend streams. Although largely idiosyncratic, 15 percent of the average fund's excess risk is explained by market risk, small-firm risk, and risk that affects other closed-end funds. Copyright 1997 by American Economic Association.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (55)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819970 ... O%3B2-R&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:87:y:1997:i:1:p:155-69

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().