Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees
Hao Li,
Sherwin Rosen and
Wing Suen
American Economic Review, 2001, vol. 91, issue 5, 1478-1497
Abstract:
Committees improve decisions by pooling members' independent information, but promote manipulation, obfuscation, and exaggeration of private information when members have conflicting preferences. Committee decision procedures transform continuous data into ordered ranks through voting. This coarsens the transmission of information, but controls strategic manipulations and allows some degree of information sharing. Each member becomes more cautious in casting the crucial vote than when he alone makes the decision based on own information. Increased quality of one member's information results in his casting the crucial vote more often. Committees make better decisions for members than does delegation.
JEL-codes: D71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1478
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (65)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.91.5.1478 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees (2000) 
Working Paper: Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees (1999) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:91:y:2001:i:5:p:1478-1497
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().