Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments
Dirk Engelmann and
Martin Strobel
American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, issue 4, 857-869
Abstract:
We present simple one-shot distribution experiments comparing the relative importance of efficiency concerns, maximin preferences, and inequality aversion, as well as the relative performance of the fairness theories by Gary E Bolton and Axel Ockenfels and by Ernst Fehr and Klaus M. Schmidt. While the Fehr-Schmidt theory performs better in a direct comparison, this appears to be due to being in line with maximin preferences. More importantly, we find that a combination of efficiency concerns, maximin preferences, and selfishness can rationalize most of the data while the Bolton-Ockenfels and Fehr-Schmidt theories are unable to explain important patterns.
Date: 2004
Note: DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002741
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (730)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/0002828042002741 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/data/sept04_data_engelmann.txt (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments (2002) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:4:p:857-869
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().