The Long and Short of the Canada-U. S. Free Trade Agreement
Daniel Trefler
American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, issue 4, 870-895
Abstract:
The Canada-U. S. Free Trade Agreement provides a unique window onto the effects of a reciprocal trade agreement on an industrialized economy (Canada). For industries that experienced the deepest Canadian tariff cuts, the contraction of low-productivity plants reduced employment by 12 percent while raising industrylevel labor productivity by 15 percent. For industries that experienced the largest U. S. tariff cuts, plant-level labor productivity soared by 14 percent. These results highlight the conflict between those who bore the short-run adjustment costs (displaced workers and struggling plants) and those who are garnering the long-run gains (consumers and efficient plants).
Date: 2004
Note: DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002633
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (496)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/0002828042002633 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (2006) 
Working Paper: The long and short of the Canada-U.S. free trade agreement (2006) 
Working Paper: The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (2001) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:4:p:870-895
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().