The Cost of Business Cycles Under Endogenous Growth

Gadi Barlevy

American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, issue 4, 964-990

Abstract: Robert E. Lucas, Jr. argued that the welfare gains from reducing aggregate consumption volatility are negligible. Subsequent work that revisited his calculation continued to find small welfare benefits, further reinforcing the perception that business cycles do not matter. This paper argues instead that fluctuations can affect welfare, by affecting the growth rate of consumption. I show that fluctuations can reduce growth starting from a given initial consumption, which can imply substantial welfare effects as Lucas himself observed. Empirical evidence suggests the welfare effects are likely to be substantial, about two orders of magnitude greater than Lucas' original estimates.

Date: 2004
Note: DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002615
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (162)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/0002828042002615 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The cost of business cycles under endogenous growth (2003)
Working Paper: The Cost of Business Cycles Under Endogenous Growth (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:4:p:964-990

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().