Annuities and Individual Welfare
Thomas Davidoff (),
Jeffrey Brown and
Peter Diamond
American Economic Review, 2005, vol. 95, issue 5, 1573-1590
Abstract:
Advancing annuity demand theory, we present sufficient conditions for the optimality of full annuitization under market completeness which are substantially less restrictive than those used by Menahem E. Yaari (1965). We examine demand with market incompleteness, finding that positive annuitization remains optimal widely, but complete annuitization does not. How uninsured medical expenses affect demand for illiquid annuities depends critically on the timing of the risk. A new set of calculations with optimal consumption trajectories very different from available annuity income streams still shows a preference for considerable annuitization, suggesting that limited annuity purchases are plausibly due to psychological or behavioral biases.
Date: 2005
Note: DOI: 10.1257/000282805775014281
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (279)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/000282805775014281 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/data/dec05_data_20030535.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Annuities and Individual Welfare (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:95:y:2005:i:5:p:1573-1590
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo
More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().