Projection Bias in Catalog Orders

Michael Conlin (), Ted O'Donoghue and Timothy Vogelsang

American Economic Review, 2007, vol. 97, issue 4, 1217-1249

Abstract: Evidence suggests that people understand qualitatively how tastes change over time, but underestimate the magnitudes. This evidence is limited, however, to laboratory evidence or surveys of reported happiness. We test for such projection bias in field data. Using data on catalog orders of cold-weather items, we find evidence of projection bias over the weather—specifically, people's decisions are overinfluenced by the current weather. Our estimates suggest that if the order-date temperature declines by 30°F, the return probability increases by 3.95 percent. We also estimate a structural model to measure the magnitude of the bias. (JEL D12, L81)

Date: 2007
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.4.1217
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (85)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.97.4.1217 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/data/sept07/20050302_data.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:97:y:2007:i:4:p:1217-1249

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().