Surviving Andersonville: The Benefits of Social Networks in POW Camps

Dora Costa and Matthew Kahn

American Economic Review, 2007, vol. 97, issue 4, 1467-1487

Abstract: Twenty-seven percent of the Union Army prisoners captured July 1863 or later died in captivity. At Andersonville, the death rate may have been as high as 40 percent. How did men survive such horrific conditions? Using two independent datasets, we find that friends had a statistically significant positive effect on survival probabilities and that the closer the ties between friends as measured by such identifiers as ethnicity, kinship, and the same hometown, the bigger was the impact of friends on survival probabilities. (JEL N41, Z13)

Date: 2007
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.4.1467
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.97.4.1467 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/data/sept07/20050916_data.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Surviving Andersonville: The Benefits of Social Networks in POW Camps (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:97:y:2007:i:4:p:1467-1487

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().