Temperature and Decisions: Evidence from 207,000 Court Cases
Anthony Heyes and
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2019, vol. 11, issue 2, 238-65
We analyze the impact of outdoor temperature on high-stakes decisions (immigration adjudications) made by professional decision-makers (US immigration judges). In our preferred specification, which includes spatial, temporal, and judge fixed effects, and controls for various potential confounders, a 10°F degree increase in case-day temperature reduces decisions favorable to the applicant by 6.55 percent. This is despite judgements being made indoors, "protected" by climate control. Results are consistent with established links from temperature to mood and risk appetite and have important implications for evaluating the influence of climate on "cognitive output."
JEL-codes: K37 K41 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/app.20170223
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... wDzYkjGqJdg130Y54bvf (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... iMGKRL0V66DRKtvmcl87 (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:238-65
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics is currently edited by Alexandre Mas
More articles in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().