Explaining Charter School Effectiveness
Joshua Angrist (),
Parag Pathak and
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2013, vol. 5, issue 4, 1-27
Lottery estimates suggest Massachusetts' urban charter schools boost achievement well beyond that of traditional urban public schools students, while nonurban charters reduce achievement from a higher baseline. The fact that urban charters are most effective for poor nonwhites and low-baseline achievers contributes to, but does not fully explain, these differences. We therefore link school-level charter impacts to school inputs and practices. The relative efficacy of urban lottery sample charters is accounted for by these schools' embrace of the No Excuses approach to urban education. In our Massachusetts sample, Non-No-Excuses urban charters are no more effective than nonurban charters
JEL-codes: H75 I21 I28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/app.5.4.1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (109) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: Explaining Charter School Effectiveness (2012)
Working Paper: Explaining Charter School Effectiveness (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:1-27
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics is currently edited by Alexandre Mas
More articles in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().